Congress recently slammed a new government rule. It calls the order “unconstitutional.” This rule asks phone makers to pre-install an app. The app is named Sanchar Saathi.
The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) gave this order. It told all mobile phone companies to do it. The direction came out on March 15, 2024. All new mobile phones must now have this app.
This move has sparked a big debate. Many worry about privacy. Do you think the government should force apps on your phone?
New Sanchar Saathi App Rule Explained
The Sanchar Saathi app helps phone users. It finds lost or stolen phones. It also blocks bad calls and messages. This protects you from phone scams. It helps find fraudulent mobile connections. Many see these as good features.
However, the mandatory installation is the problem. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh strongly criticized it. He stated this is a “direct assault” on your privacy. He feels it creates a “surveillance state.” This means the government could watch everyone.
The app tracks your phone’s IMEI number. This is a unique ID for your device. It can also link to other personal data. This includes your Aadhar number and DigiLocker details. This connection raises serious questions. It impacts fundamental rights.
The government aims to enhance user safety. They want to fight cybercrime better. The app helps trace illegal activities. It offers a tool to quickly report theft. This might seem helpful at first glance.
Privacy Concerns and Your Rights
The core issue is privacy. India’s Supreme Court declared privacy a fundamental right. This right protects your personal space. Forcing an app on every new phone might break this trust. You can learn more about fundamental rights on the official Indian government portal.
Jairam Ramesh asked key questions:
Does the government have the right to force an app?
Should citizens choose to install it?
* Will this lead to mass surveillance?
He points out a big difference. Users can choose to download the app. This is fine. But making it compulsory is another matter. It takes away your choice. This changes a helpful tool into a potential spy.
The DoT’s directive lacks public discussion. There was no parliamentary debate. Citizens did not get to share their views. This absence of discussion worries many. It suggests a lack of transparency.
The government defends its actions. They say the app secures digital communication. They want to prevent fraud effectively. They believe this measure protects millions of users. The Department of Telecommunications manages these policies. You can visit their official site for more information.
What are your thoughts on this new rule? Is security more important than privacy? Or should you always have a choice? This debate continues to unfold. Many watch closely for the next steps.